
Applied
Magnetics - Geosciences 439
Tectonics, Structure, and Exploration
Spring 2011
Professor:
Steve Sheriff
Grading: Based on exams,
problem
sets, project
reports, participation (on grading
papers).
The syllabus
and the ad
for the course provide some direction on content
and your responsibilities.
Spring Semester 2011:
1/24/2011:
Introduction to the course, general concepts, basic Earth parameters;
- aeromagnetic Montana.
1/26: Aeromagnetic SW Montana (kmz: 1,
2; wmv);
near
surface (ppt-TMI
GPR), magnetic units (1,
2)
and the fluxgate(2)
demo. Geomagnetism,
declination, inclination,
magnetic
elements, geocentric axial
dipole hypothesis, secular
variation.
1/31:
Bar magnets,
Missoula (D, I, .xls),
magnetic potential and the uniformly magnetized sphere (spherical
coordinates, dv)
2/2: More on the equation
for a
uniformly magnetized sphere (flux
pattern, Butler's derivation
and a Geomagnetic
Field applet).
The dipole
equation - the fundamental equation of paleomagnetism; inclination
versus latitude, early paleomagnetism excerpt: Collinson
& Runcorn, 1960. Averaging
vectors. Self
assessment - these abstracts should make sense: translations
and rotations (1,
2,
3).
2/7:
Spherical trig (see Butler's appendix)
and stereonet
(web bonus: dot
product) solutions for the distance between two points on a sphere,
epicenter determination, apparent pole positions, and the calculation
of apparent pole positions; Pole
to field mapping (D, I) <--> VGP.
2/9: Assignment;
apparent
polar wander, APW
paths.
Transforms (1,
2),
2D tectonics, relative velocity vectors. More transform faults (Isacks_Oliver_Sykes),
Euler
poles, hot spot tracks (1,2),
hotspot reference
frame, paleomagnetic
Euler poles (figure). Local paleomagnetic
examples (Doughty,
Jolly,
Brunt,
Sheriff).
Then a quick: Curie
temperature &
magnetic minerals.
2/14: A sidelight on the auroras,
then induced vs remanent magnetization and the intuitive approach to
total field magnetic anomalies.
Assignment: Find and read a structure/tectonics
paper that uses paleomagnetism to measure local rotations, distributed
deformation, or apparent polar wander paths. Prepare a 10 minute (+/-)
presentation of this paper to share in class next Wednesday (2/23).
Your presentation outline: authors, problem addressed, methods, results,
your thoughts. You can find papers which reference others (e.g. Doughty
& Sheriff, Jolly
& Sheriff, Sheriff,
Gunderson
& Sheriff) by using cited reference search in the Mansfield Library’s
Web of Knowledge/Web of Science multidisciplinary index. I'll listen
for your understanding of paleomagnetism.
2/16: Buried dipole
applet & NW Montana, magnetic
anomalies vs latitude (1,
2,
3, 4).
Magnetic prospecting; Montana
aeromagnetics (with
geology, data, grid)
HRAM example Grauch
& Hudson, 2007 (field,
faults). Total field (scalar) anomalies, fluxgate,
proton
precession (2)
and cesium
vapor magnetometers - details
from GEM Systems.
2/21: Presidents go skiing...
2/23: Your presentations and problems
for next week (the spreadsheet,
Solver
demo, xls)
and a quick look at vector end point diagrams (vector
mixing, components).
2/28: Poisson's
relation, then 2D, 2.5D, and 3D modeling: Talwani
algorithm,
3/2: Discuss the
homework, a
new problem set, then: Software: pblock,
pdike, (Cooper's
Software, mine).
And maybe Fourier series and filters in the frequency domain - high
pass, low pass, bandpass, notch, and threshold. (better images: Fourier_demo(.ppt).
3/7: Return problems;
Euler Pole prob-xls;
Fourier examples: my.ppt, Fourier
series applet, Fourier
transform applet, 2D
power/amplitude spectra. Good definitions & explanations: Fourier series and
transforms.
3/9: 2D
power/amplitude spectra (the
filters). Magnetics of a randomly magnetized layer (filters: depth,{you
could compare pblock}),
radial averages, upward continuation (ppt,
pdf) & separation filtering (data).
Frequency
filtering of potential fields.
3/14:
Separation of regional/residual and qualitative
depth to source; magnetics of a random layer with slope~depth; radial
averages.
3/16: Instrument precision & stacking (.xlsx, signal/noise);
separation of regional/residual;
statistical methods (Spector & Grant Figure (1,
2)). Applications: Acquisition,
gridding
& contouring (figure:
4 methods) with Surfer
(data); the
USGS extensions
to Oasis
Montaj: decorrugation (PowerLine),
upward continuation (Yellowstone
Lake#5), RTP, radial power spectra (MYAP data,
grid);
3/21:
Reduction
to pole (RTP with latitude,
Blakely excerpt), pseudogravity
(Blakely excerpt; Chicxulub
2010 (ref)),
and matched
filtering (step-by-step,
MYAP example.ppt,
filter
choices).
3/23:Public
data (Geonet;
MT_Geol.kmz; NW_Montana
(dat, grd,
kmz); Beaverhead
(mag, grav)).
In the Lab CHCB11;
data, Oasis Montaj, and the USGS extensions. Assignment:
- Make a new folder on the desktop, using your name or something distinct.
Do all your downloads and calculations in this folder; it will end
up with lots of files!
- Choose one of
the Montana data sets (NW_MT,
NC_MT, SW_MT)
and use Surfer
to experiment, grid, and visualize the data appropriately. Alternatively,
choose an area in the US
or Canada
in which you are more interested in which case you'll need to change
longitude, latitude pairs to UTM coordinate pairs; I use Corpscon.
- Experiment with
RTP (reduction to pole) and upward
continuation using the USGS/Oasis Montaj package; learn to separate
deeper sources from more shallow sources using equivalent layers and
subtracting upward continuations. Put together a good, explanatory
graphic presentation and show it to me.
- For
matched filtering the computers in CHCB11 have to be booted in Window's
SAFE MODE (rattle F8 while rebooting!!)
- For these data
from Yellowstone (acquired at 5Hz with a one meter line spacing),
use matched filtering
to separate equivalent layers and remove the near surface noise -
show me
- Use upward continuation of these
data acquired over a visible
stone ring to determine how deep you could bury them and still
see the magnetic anomaly.
- Think about all this as you do it and make sure
you understand what you are doing.
3/28: MIDTERM - in class
3/30: Questions and some more lab stuff:
- For these magnetic
data from the MacKenzie
dike swarm, extract (from .dat) a 20 km x 20 km section that has
dikes and other sources, and see how well you can separate the signals
from dikes versus that from deeper sources.
- For these archaeological
scale data, grid, clean, separate
and present the results as best you can. That is, separate regional
and noise components to best isolate anomalies at the meter scale.
4/11: Edge
detection: First
vertical and second vertical derivatives, HGM, analytic
signal (low
latitudes), local wavenumber, tilt derivative.
4/13: More edge detection, fabric analysis: compare
2VD, HGM, AS, TiltD; and disk w/
Montaj.
Lab assignment (your turn) - edge detection on single and mixed anomalies:
- Use horizontal gradient, analytic signal, local wavenumber, and tilt derivative analysis on the TMI from a set of simulated kimberlite pipes. You might first have to reduce the noise a bit. Email me a 1-3 page analysis (not counting color figures) of the methods with respect to these data. Include a figure comparing (overlay) the maxima of the horizontal gradient and analytic signal on the zero contour of the tilt derivative.
- Use horizontal gradient, analytic signal, local wavenumber, and tilt derivative analysis on the Mackenzie Dike data. Email me a 1-3 page analysis (not counting color figures) of the methods with respect to these data. Include a figure (overlay) plotting the maxima of the local wavenumber.
4/18: Google Earth
and geology, magnetics
(TMI, HGM),
and gravity (regional, residual, observations, HGM),
in the Bitterroot Valley - Note! Google Earth in CHCB is rectifying these differently than on other computers. The magnetic and gravity results are shifted south in CHCB 344 compared to other computers! Edge detection
on models (ppt);
- Read this for self
assessment: Phillips,
1998 - it should be making sense.
4/20: Edges and enhancement - good Grauch
.ppt. Depth estimates: slope
half-slope (example). Euler deconvolution (figures: 1, 2, low latitude); least
squares/simultaneous equations explained. Example - calculate for Stevensville grid and compare the inverse result.
4:/25: More Euler
deconvolution - finish our solution on clipped grid then into Voxler;
example figures:(sphere, combined solutions, low latitude);
informational papers: 1,
2.
4/27: Euler results from an operational computer: Euler.dat, Stevi.wmv. Werner
deconvolution (Stevi example). MAGCAD in DOSBOX (mount c c:\) - forward models! Models
from Surfer.
5/2: Depth estimates
from the analytic signal and horizontal gradient. Curvature/special
function depth analysis; from Phillips et al., 2007 on curvature. Assignment:
read for self assessment and discussion: Li
et al., 2005.
5/4: Gridding-MacKenzie Dikes @ 100m_kmz; the grids (100m, 1000m), sampling/gridding.ppt, Stevi-Werner example. Magnetic
modeling using models
from Surfer and PFmag3D (program) from R.
Blakely in the USGS
DOS software collection; Faulted Dome (function, model, TMI). Using Phillip's Special Function Depth Analysis in Oasis.
5/10: Final Exam: 3:20 - 5:20, Tuesday 5/10 - we'll meet for discussion but the TAKEHOME EXAM is due Thursday at 6:00 PM by email (to allow color figures; you can print it if you'd rather). Recreational inverse solutions from UBC-GIF: Philipsburg Batholith (Pburg.ppt,.wmv, .wmv2, Darby.wmv) and then invert the faulted dome model (zipped).
The Spring 2010 course
The Spring 2009
course
The Spring 2008
course.
|